Hub3E vs Alternel: a CRM doesn't prospect for you
Hub3E is a solid placement CRM that manages candidates and companies already in your pipeline. It doesn't find new employers, reach out to them, or tell you who the hiring manager is. That gap is what Alternel was built to close.

Most CFAs evaluate placement software by asking: "Can it manage our candidates?" It's the right question for the wrong problem.
Candidate management is the easy part. You have students, you have some companies in the network, you track who's talking to whom and make sure the contract gets signed. Any decent CRM does that. The hard part is the step before: finding companies that should be hiring your graduates, reaching the person who actually makes that call, and doing it before the nine other CFAs covering your territory do.
Hub3E and Alternel don't compete for that job. They're built for different moments in the same process, and most schools don't realize they're missing one of them.
What Hub3E actually is
Hub3E, built by Linkpart out of Lyon, describes itself as the specialist in "the marriage of three": students, training centers, and employers. That framing is accurate. The platform manages the tripartite relationship that defines every alternance placement.
The workflow runs in four stages: capture candidates and companies, qualify and match them using AI, track the relationship through to placement, generate the documentation. Hub3E integrates with Yparéo, the ERP that many French CFAs run for contracts and Qualiopi compliance. More than 200 training centers use it. The company reports 25,000+ placements processed since launch.
The features are real. Bulk email and SMS follow-ups. Landing page builder for lead capture. RGPD-compliant data handling. Dashboards tracking placements, application rates, source attribution. A database of 100,000+ registered companies.
Alexandre Dorget at L'École by CCI Haute-Savoie: "We strongly recommend Hub3E to any alternation training center seeking to modernize."
That's a genuine endorsement. Hub3E does what it says. The question is what it doesn't say.
The thing Hub3E doesn't do
Hub3E's workflow starts at capture: companies enter the system because they registered themselves, or your team added them manually.
Nowhere in that workflow does Hub3E go looking for companies that aren't already in your pipeline.
It doesn't scan job boards to find employers actively hiring for roles that match your programs. It doesn't analyze a posting to figure out who the operational manager is: the one who will actually supervise the apprentice, not the HR address in the job ad. It doesn't find that person's email, phone number, or LinkedIn. It doesn't send them a personalized sequence across email, LinkedIn, and phone. And when they respond and your coordinator needs to call, Hub3E doesn't create a call task pre-loaded with the context.
CRIPT's IT administrator described Hub3E's value as "simplification of recruitment processes with improved candidate tracking coordination." The key word is tracking. The platform excels at tracking what's already in motion. Generating motion is a different job entirely.
L'École by CCI surfaced a related gap: Parcoursup registrations require manual re-entry because the API integration is insufficient. The Studea integration was still "under development" at the time of their review. That's typical CRM territory: strong on known data, weaker at reaching beyond its own ecosystem.
Where the 180 minutes go
I've watched placement coordinators run this manually. It doesn't look dramatic. It just accumulates.
Scanning job boards for relevant postings takes 30-45 minutes. Cross-referencing against program curricula to confirm the role is actually a fit: 15-20 minutes. Finding the operational manager on LinkedIn (not the recruiter listed on the posting, the person who will supervise the apprentice): 20-30 minutes. Tracking down direct contact info: 15-20 minutes. Drafting an outreach message personalized to the role and the program: 20-30 minutes. Logging everything to the CRM: 10-15 minutes.
That's 110-160 minutes per qualified opportunity, before a single conversation happens. A CFA targeting 50 new employer contacts per week is running a full-time job just to get to the point where Hub3E's workflow begins.
Hub3E's Educpros coverage cites a 40% increase in candidate capture. That's meaningful: the platform helps schools attract and convert more students. Employer-side development isn't what that figure measures, because that's not what Hub3E is built for.
Side by side
| Capability | Hub3E | Alternel |
|---|---|---|
| Candidate pipeline management | Full workflow | Not the focus |
| Company/employer CRM | Yes, 100K+ registered | Yes, built from outbound sourcing |
| Job board scanning | Not available | 1,000+ boards, semantic search |
| Proactive employer discovery | Not available | Core function |
| Hiring manager identification | Not available | Yes, even when unlisted |
| Contact enrichment (email/phone/LinkedIn) | Not available | Yes |
| Multi-channel outreach (email + LinkedIn + calling) | Not available | Yes, automated |
| Outreach personalization | Not available | AI-personalized per role and program |
| External CRM sync (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Monday) | Not available | Yes |
| Call tasks with full context | Not available | Auto-created |
| ERP integration | Yparéo | Not the focus |
| Qualiopi compliance tools | Yes | Not the focus |
Two different tools for two different moments.
Hub3E manages what your placement team already has: candidates in the system, companies registered, relationships in progress. Alternel builds the employer pipeline that feeds that process. If companies come to you reliably and your team has the capacity to handle them manually, Hub3E does the job. If your team is spending days trying to find companies before competing schools do, you need something else.
What a prospecting workflow actually changes
The 180-minute problem isn't just a time problem. It's a quality problem.
When coordinators spend most of their outreach time on research, they cut corners. They contact whoever's listed on the posting rather than the decision-maker. They send generic messages because personalization takes too long. They cover fewer companies per week. When a coordinator leaves mid-year, their research notes, usually a half-updated spreadsheet, leave with them.
Alternel handles this differently. Semantic search across 1,000+ job boards finds postings that keyword matching misses: roles with non-obvious titles, companies that describe requirements differently, postings that don't use your program's vocabulary. The AI qualifies each opportunity against your specific training programs, not a generic job category.
The hiring manager identification is where the math changes most. Most alternance postings list HR or a generic recruitment address. The operational manager who will actually supervise the apprentice, and who makes the real hiring decision, is almost never named. Alternel analyzes organizational structure to find that person, even when they're not mentioned anywhere in the job ad. That's where the 5x contact targeting improvement comes from: reaching the person who decides, not the person who collects CVs.
Once the contact is enriched with email, phone, and LinkedIn, outreach runs automatically, personalized to the role and program match. Every interaction syncs to the school's CRM. Call tasks get created with full context: who to call, why this opportunity matters, what the AI found during qualification. Nothing depends on a specific coordinator being in the office.
3x more qualified opportunities. 5x better contact targeting. 180 minutes down to 10.
Two tools, one complete process
Hub3E is the right tool for managing placement operations once employer relationships are established. Tripartite tracking, Qualiopi compliance support, Yparéo integration: genuinely useful for schools that have a working employer network and need to manage it at scale.
Alternel is the right tool for building that network, and for expanding it faster than a coordinator working manually can. It runs the prospecting workflow most CFAs are doing by hand, across disconnected tools, at significant time cost.
A school using Hub3E without an outbound employer development layer is running on whatever demand already exists: companies that registered themselves, contacts the team knows from previous years, postings found manually during the morning board scan. That works. Until September hits and every CFA in the region is competing for the same employer relationships.
The schools that win placements consistently aren't the ones with the most organized CRM. They're the ones that reach the hiring manager before the posting goes public. That's not a CRM function.
We built Alternel for the placement teams that were tired of finding a good opportunity, only to discover a competing school had already called.
Sources
- Hub3E - CRM ATS logiciel alternance — Full feature list, 4-stage workflow (Capter, Qualifier, Mettre en relation, Placer)
- Hub3E - Homepage — 200+ training centers, 100K+ company database, general positioning
- L'Etudiant Educpros - Hub3E — 40% candidate capture figure, 25K+ placements, Linkpart founding context
- Hub3E - Témoignage CRIPT — Yparéo integration, workflow benefits, Sinbad Hammouche quote
- Hub3E - Témoignage L'École by CCI — Integration gaps (Parcoursup, Studea), Alexandre Dorget recommendation
- Ypareo - Intégrations — Hub3E confirmed as Ypareo ecosystem partner
- Alternel — 3x opportunities, 5x targeting, 180→10 min metrics, CRM integrations, full feature set
Ready to automate CFA placement outreach?
See how Alternel finds employers, identifies decision-makers, and books conversations before the competition.